Search for: "Couch v. Lawrence" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2018, 1:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Concerning the fellow-servant rule, the doctrine of vicarious liability and the doctrine of respondeat superior in New York StateBuckley v City Of New York, 56 N.Y.2d 300 [Decided with Lawrence v City of New York]These cases essentially involved the question of whether the fellow-servant rule continues to apply in New York. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:39 am by Alan Ackerman
” The rental house across the street, which needs paint and has an old couch on the porch, is not “blighted. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Supreme Court then reversed itself seventeen years later, in Lawrence v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As recently as 2003, when the Supreme Court invalidated a state law forbidding same-sex sodomy in Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:34 pm
At that meeting, the allegations against Bishop Lawrence were either already on the agenda, or they were not. 3. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:06 am by velvel
June 19, 2009Re: SIPC’s Objections To The Posting Called “Irving Picard’s Three Percent Commission In The Madoff Case. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am by Edith Roberts
One opinion in an insurance case featured a meditation on the humble penny, which “tend[s] to sit at the bottom of change jars or vanish into the cracks between couch cushions. [read post]